Add your almost cooked pasta of choice, toss, and cook all together for 1-2 minutes more.ĩ. Stir in 1 ladle of pasta water to your sauce.Ĩ. Add in the cooked lobster, shrimp, and mushrooms.ħ. Add remaining parsley, basil, nutmeg, salt, and pepper and stir. Continue cooking and whisk for 5 minutes.Ħ. Add the water, bouillon cubes, and clam broth. Add the 1/2 cup white wine and cook for 2 minutes. While the mushrooms are cooking, use the original pan and add remaining garlic, olive oil, butter, and lobster shell and sauté the cherry tomatoes until they break down. In a separate pan, add butter and sauté the sliced mushrooms.Ħ. In the same pan, do the same with the shrimp.ĥ. Once done, remove the lobster from the pan and set aside.ĥ. Sauté the chopped lobster, 1/3 of the garlic, half the chopped shallots, a tablespoon of parsley, salt, and pepper in butter. Remove the tails, and cut the shrimp into bite size pieces. Cut the meat in bite size pieces and rinse the shell to use later.ģ. In the meantime, cut the lobster tail in half to get the meat out. Boil water and cook the pasta until it is almost al denteĢ. And if they are, it's as simple as running regedit32.exe, finding the key/value, and updating it.1. For example - some older versions of Windows were restricting the number of half-open connections allowed in any given time for security reasons, but that's either been removed, or can be patched (see - ).Īs far as I can figure this out with research, if you are running anything at or above Vista SP2, you are unlikely to have any TCP/IP limits sets. Some TCP/IP Registry settings for controlling conections and rate limits. User login, printer, network and file sharing limits - that get wrongly confused with TCP/IP connections - that have absolutly nothing to do with Apache, IIS, or any other web server software installed on Windows. Regardless of the answer above that has been selected and upvoted, there are no artificial incoming TCP/IP connection limits on any current Windows versions to prevent you from running a web server on a non-server OS. Should be able to figure out which edition you favor from that. Seems the webpage for the Server 2008 edition comparison now redirects to some "buy Server 2012" BS, so all I can provide is this link to a pdf from that compares available features in the different editions of Server 2008 R2. Either way, the most important thing is that you use a server OS, and don't try to run this off of Windows 7 or XP (or Vista or 8). If all you're going to do is use it for a small web server, it might be worth saving a few bucks by using the Web edition, but that would not be my preference. This service pack is available for Windows XP Professional, 圆4 Edition. In addition, it adds new features and updates to existing Windows Server 2003 features and utilities. Web is basically a stripped down version of Standard that doesn't have the capability to run roles other than IIS and/or DNS. Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 (SP2) is a cumulative service pack that includes the latest updates and provides enhancements to security and stability. So, scratch XP and 7 off the list right now, and you're left with 2008 Web Edition and 2008 Standard Edition. Yes, there are connection limit differences between the versions/editions of Windows, and the non-server versions are deliberately limited to a very low number of concurrent inbound connections to prevent people from running a server on a non-server OS, precisely so that people who want to run a server of any size have to pay the heftier license cost for a Windows Server edition in order to do so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |